Coronary Angioplasty with a Drug-Coated Balloon Catheter in the Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndromes: Medico-Social Perspectives and Challenges of Use in the Setting of Diffuse Coronary Artery Lesions — A Literature Review

Keywords: dual antiplatelet therapy reduction, vascular wall regeneration, in-stent restenosis treatment, thrombotic risk minimization, interventional cardiology innovations, high-risk cardiac patients, urgent surgical intervention safety, endothelial function preservation

Abstract

This literature review explores the role of drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty in the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS), with a particular focus on patients with diffuse coronary artery disease.

Aim. To conduct a literature review on the benefits of using DCB in the treatment of patients with diffuse coronary artery disease and ACS.

Materials and methods. Unlike traditional drug-eluting stents (DES), DCB technology delivers antiproliferative drugs directly to the lesion site without leaving behind a permanent implant, offering significant advantages such as reduced risk of in-stent restenosis (ISR), lower rates of thrombosis, and shorter required durations of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). These benefits are especially relevant in high-risk populations, including elderly patients, those at high risk of bleeding, or those requiring urgent non-cardiac surgery. The review synthesizes data from key randomized controlled trials (PEPCAD NSTEMI, REVELATION, BASKET-SMALL 2), and meta-analyses.

Results. The review demonstrates the non-inferiority of DCB compared to DES in terms of major cardiovascular outcomes, even in complex settings, such as ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OOHCA). In addition, DCB has proven effective in treating ISR and preserving endothelial function, with evidence of late lumen enlargement and minimal vascular trauma. However, challenges remain, including the need for precise lesion preparation, proper balloon sizing, and operator expertise. Limitations in long-term data and heterogeneity in patient selection across studies highlight the need for further large-scale trials.

Conclusions. DCB angioplasty represents a promising, less invasive strategy in interventional cardiology, particularly in patients with diffuse or high-risk coronary lesions, though widespread adoption will depend on continued research and protocol optimization.

References

  1. Niehe SR, Vos NS, Van Der Schaaf RJ, Amoroso G, Herrman J-PR, Patterson MS, et al. Two-year clinical outcomes of the REVELATION study: sustained safety and feasibility of paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty versus drug-eluting stent in acute myocardial infarction. J Invasive Cardiol. 2022;34:E39–42. DOI: 10.25270/jic/20.00741
  2. Scheller B, Ohlow MA, Ewen S, Kische S, Rudolph TK, Clever YP, et al. Bare metal or drug-eluting stent versus drug-coated balloon in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the randomised PEPCAD NSTEMI trial. EuroIntervention. 2020 Apr 17;15(17):1527-1533. DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00723
  3. Fahrni G, Scheller B, Coslovsky M, Gilgen N, Farah A, Ohlow MA, et al. BASKET-SMALL 2 Investigators. Drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent in small coronary artery lesions: angiographic analysis from the BASKET-SMALL 2 trial. Clin Res Cardiol. 2020 Sep;109(9):1114-1124. DOI: 10.1007/s00392-020-01603-2
  4. Kim S, Kang DO, Her AY, Song WH, Shin ES. Drug-Coated Balloon-Based Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in De Novo Coronary Artery Disease and Tips for Procedural Success. J Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Oct;3(4):190-198. https://doi.org/10.54912/jci.2024.0019
  5. Madhavan MV, Kirtane AJ, Redfors B, Généreux P, Ben-Yehuda O, Palmerini T, et al. Stent-Related Adverse Events >1 Year After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Feb 18;75(6):590-604. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.11.058
  6. Carrick D, Oldroyd KG, McEntegart M, et al. A randomized trial of deferred stenting versus immediate stenting to prevent no- or slow-reflow in acute st-segment elevation myocardial infarction (DEFER-STEMI). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:2088–98. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.530
  7. Vos NS, Dirksen MT, Vink MA, van Nooijen FC, Amoroso G, Herrman J-PR, Kiemeneij F, et al. Safety and feasibility of a PAclitaxel-eluting balloon angioplasty in Primary Percutaneous coronary intervention in Amsterdam (PAPPA): one-year clinical outcome of a pilot study. EuroIntervention. 2014;10:584–90. DOI: 10.4244/EIJV10I5A101
  8. Colombo A, Leone PP. Redefining the way to perform percutaneous coronary intervention: a view in search of evidence. Eur Heart J. 2023 Nov 1;44(41):4321-4323. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad215
  9. Jeger RV, Eccleshall S, Wan Ahmad WA, Ge J, Poerner TC, Shin ES, Alfonso F, et al. International DCB Consensus Group. Drug-Coated Balloons for Coronary Artery Disease: Third Report of the International DCB Consensus Group. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jun 22;13(12):1391-1402. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.02.043
  10. Jing Q.M., Zhao X., Han Y.L., Gao L.L., et al. A drug-eluting Balloon for the trEatment of coronarY bifurcatiON lesions in the side branch: a prospective multicenter ranDomized (BEYOND) clinical trial in China. Chin Med J. 2020 Apr 20;133:899–908. DOI: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000743
  11. Kondo Y, Ishikawa T, Shimura M, Yamada K, Ukaji T, Tamura Y, Arai M, et al. Cardiovascular Outcomes after Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty versus Drug-Eluting Stent Placement for Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024;13(5):1481. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13051481
  12. Kondo Y, Ishikawa T, Shimura M, et al. Cardiovascular Outcomes after Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty versus Drug-Eluting Stent Placement for Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2024;13(5):1481. Published 2024 Mar 4. doi:10.3390/jcm13051481
  13. Florin-Leontin Lazar, Horea Laurentiu Onea, Calin Homorodean, Ioan Cornel Bitea, Diana Raluca Lazar, Mihai Claudiu Ober. Drug-Coated Balloons in All-Comer Population-Are We There Yet?. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025;14 (10):3608. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103608
  14. Silvia Renon, Rafic Ramses, Ankush Aggarwal, Richard Good, Sean McGinty. Drug coated balloons in percutaneous coronary intervention: how can computational modeling help inform evolving clinical practice?. Frontiers in Medical Technology. 2025;7. DOI: 10.3389/fmedt.2025.1546417
  15. Gurgoglione FL, Gattuso D, Greco A, Donelli D, Niccoli G, Cortese B. Angiographic and clinical impact of balloon inflation time in percutaneous coronary interventions with sirolimus-coated balloon: A subanalysis of the EASTBOURNE study. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2025;73:70-75. doi:10.1016/j.carrev.2024.07.021
  16. Mekhtiyeva Fatma Bk, Bilʹchenko O. Zvʺyazok mekhanichnoyi dysynkhroniyi miokarda livoho shlunochka ta kilʹkosti urazhenykh koronarnykh arteriy u khvorykh na koronarnu khvorobu sertsya, yakym provodylasʹ revaskulyaryzatsiya. The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series Medicine. 2024;32(1(48):40-8. Available from: https://ukrmedsci.com/index.php/visnyk/article/view/4
  17. Greco A, Di Leo G, Spagnolo M, Giacoppo D, Capodanno D. Expanding indications for drug-coated balloons in coronary artery disease. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2025;22(4):321-338. doi:10.1080/17434440.2025.2474179
  18. Camaj A, Leone PP, Colombo A, et al. Drug-Coated Balloons for the Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease: A Review. JAMA Cardiol. 2025;10(2):189-198. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2024.4244
Published
2025-06-25
How to Cite
1.
Aksenov EV, Hladun AY, Kalashnikov SA. Coronary Angioplasty with a Drug-Coated Balloon Catheter in the Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndromes: Medico-Social Perspectives and Challenges of Use in the Setting of Diffuse Coronary Artery Lesions — A Literature Review. ujcvs [Internet]. 2025Jun.25 [cited 2025Jun.28];33(2):18-2. Available from: https://www.cvs.org.ua/index.php/ujcvs/article/view/725