Experience of Morphologic Left Ventricle Training in Congenitally Corrected Transposition of the Great Arteries in Children: Evaluation of the Operation Results

Keywords: congenital heart disease, intact ventricular septum, pulmonary artery banding, tricuspid regurgitation, anatomical correction

Abstract

The aim. To evaluate the efficacy of morphologic left ventricle (mLV) training through pulmonary artery banding (PAB) in pediatric patients with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries.

Materials and methods. From 2003 to 2023, 12 patients underwent PAB for mLV training at the Ukrainian Children`s Cardiac Center. The mean age of the patients was 30.3 ± 25.1 months, the mean weight was 11.6 ± 5.2 kg. Hemodynamic parameters were assessed to determine the size of the band applied to the pulmonary artery (PA) trunk during the operation. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography was performed in 6 patients. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was performed in the early postoperative period. In the remote period, all the patients underwent TTE and X-ray angiography.

Results. During PAB, the mLV pressure averaged 58 ± 12.6% (from 40% to 80%) of the systemic arterial pressure. PAB dilatation was required for one patient in the early postoperative period (postoperative day 2) because of significant hemodynamic changes. In the early postoperative period, the maximum gradient across PA measured by TTE averaged 39.3 ± 10.0 mm Hg (from 25 to 60 mm Hg). There was no hospital mortality.

The follow-up period averaged 47.2 ± 26.0 months (8 to 113 months). In the long-term observation period, 2 patients (16.6%) died, one 8 months and the other 5 years after the operation. The double switch operation was performed in 6 patients, on average, 48.2 ± 6.9 months after PAB. According to angiography, the mLV pressure before the double switch operation was 90.2 ± 11.6% of that in the systemic right ventricle. The end-diastolic pressure in the mLV averaged 14 ± 4.1 mm Hg. The peak pressure gradient across the PA measured by echo was 81.3 ± 28.8 mm Hg. The mLV mass index averaged 62.9 ± 8.8 g/m2, the mLV ejection fraction averaged 61.2 ± 2.9%. Overall radiographic and echocardiographic data in these patients indicated that mLV is trained and capable of performing the role of a systemic ventricle after anatomical correction.

Conclusions. PA banding as a method of mLV training can be used in patients with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries with intact ventricular septum, restrictive ventricular septal defects and severe tricuspid regurgitation.

To evaluate the effectiveness of PAB for mLV training, a multimodal diagnostic approach is used, including non-invasive and invasive methods such as TTE, transesophageal echocardiography, and cardiac catheterization. The optimal age for PAB in patients of this group for the purpose of training the LV was on average 2-2.5 years.

References

  1. Wallis GA, Debich-Spicer D, Anderson RH. Congenitally corrected transposition. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2011 May 14;6:22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1172-6-22
  2. Dyer K, Graham TP. Congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries: Current treatment options. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2003;5(5):399-407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-003-0046-4
  3. Miller JR, Sebastian V, Eghtesady P. Management Options for Congenitally Corrected Transposition: Which, When, and for Whom? Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu. 2022;25:38-47. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.pcsu.2022.04.001
  4. Spigel Z, Binsalamah ZM, Caldarone C. Congenitally Corrected Transposition of the Great Arteries: Anatomic, Physiologic Repair, and Palliation. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu. 2019;22:32-42. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.pcsu.2019.02.008
  5. Mee RB. Severe right ventricular failure after Mustard or Senning operation. Two-stage repair: Pulmonary artery banding and switch. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1986;92(3 Pt 1):385-390.
  6. Zartner PA, Schneider MB, Asfour B, Hraška V. Enhanced left ventricular training in corrected transposition of the great arteries by increasing the preload. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;49(6):1571-1576. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezv416
  7. Metton O, Gaudin R, Ou P, Gerelli S, Mussa S, Sidi D, et al. Early prophylactic pulmonary artery banding in isolated congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;38(6):728-734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.03.065
  8. Cui H, Hage A, Piekarski BL, Marx GR, Baird CW, Del Nido PJ, et al. Management of Congenitally Corrected Transposition of the Great Arteries With Intact Ventricular Septum: Anatomic Repair or Palliative Treatment? Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jul;14(7):e010154. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.010154
  9. Myers PO, del Nido PJ, Geva T, Bautista-Hernandez V, Chen P, Mayer JE Jr, et al. Impact of Age and Duration of Banding on Left Ventricular Preparation Before Anatomic Repair for Congenitally Corrected Transposition of the Great Arteries. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96(2):603-610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.03.096
  10. Hraska V, Woods RK. Anatomic Repair of Corrected Transposition of the Great Arteries: The Double Switch. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu. 2019;22:57-60. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.pcsu.2019.02.003
  11. Barron DJ, Mahendran K. Left Ventricular Re-training: Feasibility and Effectiveness—What Are the Limits? Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu. 2019;22:43-50. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.pcsu.2019.02.005
  12. Barrios PA, Zia A, Pettersson G, Najm HK, Rajeswaran J, Bhimani S, et al.; Members of the ccTGA Working Group. Outcomes of treatment pathways in 240 patients with congenitally corrected transposition of great arteries. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;161(3):1080-1093.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.11.164
  13. Mainwaring RD, Patrick WL, Arunamata A, Chan F, Newman B, Rosenblatt TR, et al. Left ventricular retraining in corrected transposition: Relationship between pressure and mass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;159(6):2356-2366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.10.053
  14. Weixler VHM, Kramer P, Murin P, Romanchenko O, Cho MY, Ovroutski S, et al. Anatomic Repair of Congenitally Corrected Transposition: Reappraisal of Eligibility Criteria. Pediatr Cardiol. 2022;43(6):1214-1222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-022-02841-z
Published
2024-03-27
How to Cite
Stohova, O. V. (2024). Experience of Morphologic Left Ventricle Training in Congenitally Corrected Transposition of the Great Arteries in Children: Evaluation of the Operation Results. Ukrainian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, 32(1), 45-50. https://doi.org/10.30702/ujcvs/24.32(01)/S003-4550